| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Killy Zane
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
   |
Posted - 2015.02.04 21:16:19 -
[1] - Quote
To the crowd of people claiming unfair advantage.
Elevate your game.
Eve is about finding and gaining advantage. Outplaying other players.
CCP Seagull has said this is the direction she is taking the game.
You say: I dont want to multibox and I'm not going to pay up for
extra accounts.
Here is what that is like: a player mining belts in their venture
yelling at people in mining barges for having an unfair advantage
while being unwilling to use a mining barge because they dont want
to and it costs too much.
Elevate your game.
-
Which of the following scenarios seem more unfair to you?
a.) I can pay real money right now and i'll have ~800,000,000 more isk than you
b.) I can pay real money right now and get isboxer and alt accounts
and in about a month from now i will have ~800,000,000 more isk than you
One of these things you don't bat an eyelid at, and it is clearly the more unfair of the two.
-
Multiboxing can be done with one moniter, for free. The fact that isboxer
is a paid service is irrelevant. You need to decide if you are against
multiboxing or isboxer. If you use the terms interchangeably, your
arguments are invalid.
In closing, get some sense you ignorant hypocrites and elevate your game. |
Killy Zane
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 04:55:56 -
[2] - Quote
This:
Marsha Mallow wrote:
You forgot to capitalise your first name. And then decided to be 'ashley'. You're not exactly 'reliable' in various contexts for these crimes. Never mind the botting, squawking, poisonous attitude, badposting etc.
does not address this:
ashley Eoner wrote:
I mean seriously your response would ban windowed mode as that changes the way the game is displayed and played. All technical of course.
and this:
Marsha Mallow wrote:I do like the language in the mail tho, especially given the drivel just before your comment.
does not address my arguments.
Its just name-calling. Speaking of calling. I'm calling you out Marsha Mallow. Address these arguments in your next post.
You can't because your positions are indefensible and you debate like a child.
You wont because you're not here to argue, you're here to fan the flames |
Killy Zane
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 05:02:18 -
[3] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:
Yes, it is different from using multiple monitors. That can go from a little bit different to vastly different, but either way its different. Just to answer the "is it any different" question.
You are using third party software (Windows) to affect the game environment by using multiple windows of various sizes.
Will there be bans handed out for using Microsoft Windows?
Does everyone see how slippery this slope is? |
Killy Zane
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 05:28:36 -
[4] - Quote
Yeah I'm serious. Look, If people are going to sit here and dig in their heels and zoom in on the exact sentence:
"You may not use your own or third-party software to modify any content appearing within the Game environment or change how the Game is played."
to go after VFX, well then lets do it. Let's take it to its logical conclusion. Windows is third party software that can effect how the game is played.
VFX is changing game windows. Windows is changing game windows.
Call it a straw man argument, call it the dumbest thing you ever heard, and when you are done mudslinging maybe try an actual rebuttal.
|
| |
|